Beginner

Beneficials Aren't OMRI Listed. That's The Point.

Go looking for an OMRI seal on a tube of predatory mites and you will not find one — on ours or on anybody's. The usual explanation is that you cannot certify something alive, and that explanation is wrong. Releasing beneficials is a practice rather than an input, and a practice has nothing in it for anyone to review.

Karen, founder of FGMN Nursery

Karen

Founder · FGMN Nursery

September 2026 11 min read
Photograph of a hand holding a small plain cylindrical tube up to window light and turning it. The tube is completely blank, with no label or printing of any kind. A shelf of potted plants sits out of focus behind.

Photograph of a hand holding a small plain cylindrical tube up to window light and turning it. The tube is completely blank, with no label or printing of any kind. A shelf of potted plants sits out of focus behind. · FGMN Nursery

Looking for an OMRI rated beneficial and struggling? Yeah, it's not you. You're meticulous about using only OMRI rated products in your garden or house and now you have pests. No doubt you are filling in an organic system plan, or a certifier has asked what you are putting on the crop, and you go looking for the OMRI seal on a tube of predatory mites. It is not there. It is not on ours, and it is not on anybody's.

The explanation you will usually get is that you cannot list something alive. That explanation is wrong. The actual reason is that releasing beneficials is a practice, and that, in and of itself, cannot be certified.

The short version

Are they OMRI Listed
No live predator product is — not from us, not from anyone
Is that because they are alive
No. OMRI lists living things by the thousand
So why not
There is no substance to review. A release is a practice, not an input
Can I use them and stay certified
Yes — releasing predators is named in the rule as a first-line practice
Why are beneficial nematodes listed then
They ship as a formulated product with carriers, and a formulation is reviewable
What do I actually do
Record the release in your organic system plan and tell your certifier
Who decides
Your certifier. Always. This article describes the rule, not your case

“You can't certify something alive” is not the reason

The Organic Materials Review Institute — OMRI, a private nonprofit that reviews products against the USDA organic rule and publishes the ones that pass — lists living organisms constantly. Its own Standards Manual puts them in scope in as many words, under the heading Biological Controls:

OMRI's own scope language

“Living organisms and viruses used as active ingredients. No genetically modified organisms.”

Status: Allowed. Every bacterial and fungal biocontrol you have ever seen with a seal on it — the Bacillus sprays, the Beauveria products, the Trichoderma root drenches — is a living organism that has been reviewed and listed.

So aliveness is not the obstacle. The difference is one of kind rather than one of paperwork.

A release is a practice, not an input

OMRI reviews inputs — things you buy and apply to a crop. A bottle of spray is an input. A bag of fertilizer is an input. Each one is a defined mixture of substances, and reviewing it means asking whether every substance in it is permitted.

Opening a tube and tipping predatory mites onto a leaf is not that. There is no substance being applied. There is an animal being moved from one place to another, where it does what it was already going to do. Nothing about that is a mixture anyone can review, which is why no review exists.

Two panels in line drawing. Left: a hand tilts an open tube over a leafy potted plant and fine granules fall onto the leaves; nothing in this panel is filled or colored. Right: on a bench, a jar of powder, a watering can, a hand stirring powder into a measuring jug of liquid, and a pump sprayer. The liquid in the jug is the only filled area in the image.
Left is a release. Right is an application. Only one of them involves a substance, which is the only reason only one of them has anything for a reviewer to look at.

And the rule already covers it directly. The USDA National Organic Program's pest management standard lists, among the mechanical and physical methods a grower may use:

7 CFR 205.206(b)(1)

“Augmentation or introduction of predators or parasites of the pest species.”

That is the entire permission. It is not conditional on a product, a brand or a seal. The practice is named in the regulation, and naming it is what makes it allowed.

This is why the correct phrase is allowed in certified organic production rather than approved. Nothing approves a release, in the way a listing approves a formulation. The rule simply permits the practice outright.

Where a release sits in the order of the rule

Section 205.206 is written as a sequence, and the order it puts things in decides which tool a certifier expects you to have reached for first.

Diagram of 7 CFR 205.206. Four boxes on one rail: (a) prevention, (b) mechanical and physical methods with releasing predators marked as (b)(1), (c) weed control, (d) disease control. Below them, separated by the quoted condition “when the practices provided for in paragraphs (a) through (d) are insufficient”, a fifth box: (e) apply a substance from the National List.
The rule in its own order. Everything on the top rail is a practice a grower may use at any time; the box underneath is reached for only when those have not been enough, and it is the one whose contents carry seals.

Paragraph (e) does not simply sit alongside the others. It opens with a condition: “When the practices provided for in paragraphs (a) through (d) … are insufficient.”

So a listed, sealed, OMRI-reviewed spray is what the regulation reaches for after the practices have not been enough. Releasing predators is one of those practices. It is not a weaker substitute for the thing with the badge — in the rule's own sequence it comes first, and the badge is on the fallback.

The missing seal on a tube of mites is not a gap in your paperwork. It is the regulation telling you that you are at an earlier and better step than the one that needs seals.

Why beneficial nematodes do carry a seal

If you have bought beneficial nematodes you have probably seen an OMRI Listed seal on the package, which seems to contradict everything above. It does not, and the reason is the same distinction.

Nematodes do not arrive as animals in a tube. They arrive as a formulated product — the organisms suspended in a gel, a clay, a wettable powder or a sponge, mixed with carriers and stabilizers that keep them alive in transit and let them go through a sprayer. That formulation is a defined mixture of substances. It is an input, and an input can be reviewed.

So the line is not drawn between living and not living. It is drawn between something you release and something you mix and apply. Nematodes fall on the input side because of how they are packaged, not because of what they are. How to actually use them is a separate question with its own piece: how to dose beneficial nematodes.

You can watch the same line in the wild. Retailers that sell both will label their nematode range as listed for organic production and make no such claim on the shelf of live predators three clicks away. That is not inconsistency. That is the two paragraphs of the rule showing through the catalog.

What an OMRI seal actually belongs to

Two things about the seal get muddled in product copy.

  • A listing belongs to a specific product from a specific company, not to a species or an organism. “Steinernema feltiae is OMRI Listed” is not a meaningful sentence. A named product containing it, sold by a named company, is listed. If a page tells you a species is listed, the page is wrong about how listings work.
  • OMRI is private and the listing is voluntary. It is a nonprofit review service, not a government agency, and no part of the organic rule requires a product to be OMRI Listed. It is a widely trusted shortcut that saves a certifier from reviewing a formulation from scratch — genuinely useful, and not the law.

Which is also why the absence of a seal proves nothing on its own. Plenty of perfectly compliant materials are unlisted because their manufacturer never paid to have them reviewed.

None of which answers whether a predator is the right tool for your problem in the first place. That turns on the pest, the room and the plant rather than on paperwork, and it has its own piece: are predatory mites right for you.

What to put in your organic system plan

The practical answer is short, and it is the same answer every time.

  1. Record the release in your organic system plan. What you released, roughly how much, where, and when. Paragraph (e) requires documentation for substances; keeping the same record for practices is what makes an inspection straightforward.
  2. Cite the paragraph if you are asked. “Augmentation of predators under 205.206(b)(1)” is the entire justification, and a certifier will recognize it immediately.
  3. Ask your certifier about the carrier if you want to be thorough. Predators ship in something — bran, vermiculite, buckwheat hulls. In practice this is incidental to the release rather than an applied input, but your certifier is the one who decides that, and they would far rather be asked in advance than at an inspection.
  4. Do not describe the release as making anything organic. Organic status belongs to a certified operation, not to a treatment. Using a permitted practice keeps you compliant; it does not confer a label.
A potting bench seen from slightly above. An open ring-bound notebook lies on it, the written page shaded, with ruled lines and indistinct handwriting marks. A hand holding a pen rests mid-entry. A small tube and a paper sachet sit beside the notebook.
The whole compliance step, in one line of a notebook. What you released, roughly how much, where, and when.

And the thing not to do: do not go hunting for a listed alternative because the mites lacked a seal. You would be trading a paragraph (b) practice for a paragraph (e) substance — moving down the rule's order, not up it.

If a certifier or a customer asks

1

Say “allowed,” not “approved.” Nothing approves a release. The regulation permits the practice, which is a stronger and more accurate thing to be able to say.

2

Never call a species OMRI Listed. Listings attach to a branded product from a named company. A species cannot hold one, and claiming otherwise is the most common error in this corner of the trade.

3

Treat “100% organic” as a legal term, because it is one. It is a defined USDA labeling category with certification behind it, not a way of saying natural. It does not belong on a bottle of predators, ours included.

4

Check the seal against the product, not the shelf. A retailer can carry listed and unlisted goods in the same category. The seal is on a SKU, and the OMRI product list is public and searchable if you want to confirm one.

5

If the answer matters to your certification, get it from your certifier. This article describes what the rule says. Only an accredited certifying agent can tell you how it applies to your operation, and they are the only opinion that counts at an inspection.

Common questions

Are predatory mites OMRI Listed?

No. We searched the OMRI product list for every genus in common commercial use — Amblyseius, Neoseiulus, Phytoseiulus, Orius, Trichogramma, Encarsia, Aphidius, Chrysoperla, Stratiolaelaps and the rest — and found no live-arthropod listing from any supplier. That is not a shortcoming of any particular brand: there is no substance for OMRI to review, because releasing predators is a practice under 7 CFR 205.206(b)(1) rather than an applied input. The list is public, so you do not have to take our word for it.

Can I use beneficial insects and keep my organic certification?

Yes. Augmentation or introduction of predators or parasites of the pest species is named in the organic rule as a permitted mechanical and physical method. Record the release in your organic system plan and tell your certifier, who makes the final call on your operation.

Why are beneficial nematodes OMRI Listed when predatory mites are not?

Because of packaging rather than biology. Nematodes ship as a formulated product — organisms in a gel, clay or powder with carriers — and a formulation is a defined mixture that can be reviewed as an input. A tube of predatory mites is not a formulation, so there is nothing to submit.

Is an OMRI Listed product better than one without a seal?

Not inherently. A listing means a formulation has been reviewed against the organic rule, which is genuinely useful when you are applying a substance. It says nothing about efficacy, and plenty of compliant materials are unlisted simply because nobody paid for the review. For a live predator there is no review to have.

Does OMRI approve or certify my farm?

No. OMRI is a private nonprofit that reviews products. Certification of an operation is done by a USDA-accredited certifying agent, and that is an entirely separate process. An OMRI listing on an input does not certify anything about the farm using it.

Does using predators make my produce organic?

No. Organic status belongs to a certified operation as a whole. Using a permitted practice keeps you inside the rules; it does not by itself let you label anything organic. “100 percent organic” in particular is a defined USDA labeling category under 7 CFR 205.301(a), with certification requirements behind it.

What about the bran or vermiculite the mites come in?

In practice it is treated as incidental to the release rather than as an applied input — it is the transport medium, not a product being spread on the crop. If your certifier wants it addressed, ask them before you release rather than after. They will tell you what they want to see in the plan.

References

  1. 7 CFR 205.206 — Crop pest, weed, and disease management practice standard, USDA National Organic Program. Paragraph (b)(1) names augmentation or introduction of predators or parasites; paragraph (e) permits National List substances only where the practices in (a) through (d) are insufficient. The source of this article's central point. ecfr.gov
  2. 7 CFR 205.301 — Product composition, USDA National Organic Program. Paragraph (a) defines what may be labeled “100 percent organic.” ecfr.gov
  3. OMRI Standards Manual for NOP Review (amended March 2024), Organic Materials Review Institute. Places living organisms used as active ingredients in scope under Biological Controls, and describes OMRI's role as a nonprofit material review organization. omri.org
  4. The OMRI Products List is public and searchable, and is the place to check any individual product rather than taking a retailer's word for it — including ours. omri.org
  5. This article describes what the regulation says. It is not certification advice, and nothing in it substitutes for your own accredited certifying agent, who is the only party that can rule on your operation.
Karen, founder of FGMN Nursery

Written by

Karen

Founder · FGMN Nursery

Karen founded FGMN Nursery in 2005 after discovering that running an aroid nursery with three parrots and a pesticide habit is not, it turns out, a viable long-term strategy. Biological pest control wasn't a business idea — it was a necessity. Twenty years of rearing and sourcing predatory mites, nematodes, and beneficial insects later, FGMN has become the resource she wished had existed when she was first googling whether Phytoseiulus persimilis would hurt a Caique. Her approach to explaining biocontrol mirrors how she came to it: practically, with a low tolerance for jargon and a high tolerance for analogies involving buffets, bad roommates, and other situations that have nothing to do with mites but somehow make the lifecycle click. If you leave a Mite Matters article understanding something you didn't before, that's the point.